By Program Segment
| Unit | Charter Org | Youth | 3-yr Trend | Retention | YPT % | Score | Status |
|---|
Composite Health Score Methodology
Each unit receives a composite score from 0–100 across four equally weighted dimensions of operational health. Scores are intended to surface units that need commissioner attention — not to rank or rate volunteers. A "Watch" or "At Risk" rating is a starting point for a conversation, not a verdict.
Dimension Weights
| Dimension | Weight | Sub-metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Membership & Retention | 30 pts | 5-yr youth count trend (15) · recharter retention rate (15) |
| Training & YPT | 25 pts | Leaders YPT current (15, graduated curve — see below) · position-specific training (10) |
| Advancement Activity | 20 pts | JTE advancement rate (10) · Eagles or AOLs per 100 youth (10) |
| Program Activity | 25 pts | Service hrs / youth (10) · OA youth membership rate (7, troops only) · JTE Outdoor metric (8) |
Score Bands
| 80+ Strong | Showcase unit. Healthy on all four dimensions. Use as a model in commissioner conversations and recruiting collateral. |
| 65–79 Healthy | Stable. Likely strong on 3 of 4 dimensions. Continue monthly commissioner cadence; no escalation needed. |
| 40–64 Watch | One or more dimensions trending poorly. Commissioner should schedule a touchpoint with key 3 within 30 days. |
| <40 At Risk | Multiple dimensions in deficit, often signaling charter renewal risk. District Chairman + Unit Commissioner joint engagement recommended. |
Data Sources
All figures are pulled from the Anawanna Trails District 13 Handoff folder: UnitMetricsStatus.csv (April 14, 2026 snapshot — retention, advancement %, JTE Outdoor flag, key-3 churn, assigned commissioner), OLRMembershipStatusSummaryReport.csv (registered leader counts), Membership-MarYYYY.xlsx × 5 (5-year youth history), SBSA Advancement Mar2025-26.xlsx (Eagle Scouts YTD), Cub Membership 2026.xlsx (Arrow of Light per pack), Service2025.csv (unit service hours), and Anawanna Trails Current OA Members export (OA youth membership per unit).
YPT Scoring Curve
YPT compliance is critical for charter renewal but should not single-handedly push otherwise-strong units into At Risk. The score is graduated rather than bucketed at 80%: 100% → 15, 90% → 12, 80% → 9, 70% → 6, 60% → 4, 50% → 2, below 50% → 1. A unit at 70% loses about a third of the credit; a unit at 100% gets full credit. This means YPT shapes the composite without dominating it.
Substitutions vs. the District Dashboard
Two metrics in the rubric use the closest equivalent in available source data: OA youth membership rate (per-unit OA members ÷ troop youth) is used in place of "OA elections held" because per-unit election dates are not tracked centrally. JTE Outdoor metric (binary Yes/No from UnitMetricsStatus) is used in place of "District event attendance" for the same reason. Both substitutions use data already collected by Council/district reporting and produce the same operational signal.
Known Caveats
Pack scores have no OA component; the Program dimension is proportionally rescaled from /18 to /25. YPT % is computed as (registered − expired − expiring before May 31) / registered, using OLR expirations and dashboard expiration aging data. Per-unit Key 3 names are not yet pulled from the registrar — the modal shows Chartered Organization and assigned Unit Commissioner only. Service hour figures use OLR-reported unit service projects (not Eagle Scout project hours, which are council-wide per the consolidation analysis correction).